- From: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:46:01 -0800
- To: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, public-fx@w3.org
Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 17:46:39 UTC
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com> wrote: > > On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:10 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote: > > Last week I sent out some ideas to update the SVG composting spec: > http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGCompositing/. > Some people suggested some improvements which I integrated. > > Here is the updated list of proposals: > a. split up the spec in 2 sections: Porter-Duff & Blending. > Porter-Duff are compositing primitives that describes how 2 images > (src+dst) can be merged. > Porter-Duff will continue to use the existing comp-op property. > > > Can I suggest that we refer to these as alpha compositing and color > compositing? I think it would make it more clear what we're talking about > (at least for me :-) And given that, I think the better names for the > properties are: 'alpha-compositing' and 'color-compositing'. > > I agree. Do you think the 'comp-op' should be renamed to 'alpha-comp' to make it more clear that we're talking about alpha compositing? I would prefer to keep the 'blending' keyword since people are already familiar with that term. Rik
Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 17:46:39 UTC