W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2011

RE: [css-shaders] Feedback about default fragment shader in CSS shaders proposal

From: <noam.rosenthal@nokia.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:57:10 +0000
To: <cmarrin@apple.com>
CC: <vhardy@adobe.com>, <www-style@w3.org>, <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9DCC9DB73CE0234F821B00AF47F30CE7A825B7@008-AM1MPN1-026.mgdnok.nokia.com>
> Ok, I've gotten myself more confused now (as Siri would say "it's not you, it's me"). As I said in my latest post on 
> blending modes, I don't think we need to do blending of the filtered element. 

OK, In this case I think we should clarify how a css-shaded element should render in case it has an opacity attribute, or if an ancestor has an opacity attribute. But I understand that that's a bigger subject that's already covered in the issue list, and the "uniform opacity" is a micro-aspect of it that should probably be discussed at a later stage, if it stays relevant.

Received on Thursday, 20 October 2011 19:59:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:39 UTC