W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: CSS Animations Targeting SVG attributes

From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 10:22:35 +1300
To: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, public-fx@w3.org
Message-ID: <20110314212235.GB2161@wok.mcc.id.au>
Robert O'Callahan:
> OK, that implies a hard requirement that arbitrary CSS rules be able to
> override any SVG attribute value. Whatever syntax you choose, that means
> effectively minting a lot of new properties. Someone should make a list of
> all the new properties that will be needed.

Patrick made a list of SVG attributes he would like to see animatable
from CSS:


That’s about 45 of them (assuming we mash together all attributes with
the same name into a single property).  The list seems reasonable at
first glance.  Initially I was in favour of promote *all* SVG attributes
that are defined to be animatable, just so that authors didn’t have to
worry about which ones are animatable (yet) and which aren’t.  Other
people on the FX call today seemed in favour of the staging approach,
where we take a subset of the attributes (like Patrick’s list) to limit
the work we need to do initially.

Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Monday, 14 March 2011 21:23:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:38 UTC