RE: [css21][css3][svg] SVG and unit-less length values from Sylvain Galineau on 2010-07-07 (public-fx@w3.org from July to September 2010)

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:02:39 +0000
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E214FC3E6@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.>

 
> Why?  Given the quoted SVG spec text, and assuming that name collisions
> are avoided and that the SVG spec refers to future CSS specs the same
> way as it does to CSS2 right now, what issues would it cause?

Yes, if it refers to future CSS specs the same way then we know what's what.
Although I'd still argue the pattern seems generally undesirable in terms of 
Usability/author confusion.

Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2010 16:03:21 UTC