- From: Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 11:58:54 +0200
- To: "Erik Bruchez" <erik@bruchez.org>
On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 18:59:35 +0200, Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> wrote: > Do you mean: > > 1. Should <alert> support @appearance at all? That one. The current spec has it as the only one of the 4 that does not support @appearance, and I can't think why not. An oversight? https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#ui-commonelems-alert > 2. Or should <alert appearance="minimal"> mean the same thing as for > <label> and <hint>? No; if we include it, it should just be the same. Steven > > On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 8:37 AM, Steven Pemberton > <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >> But not <alert>? >> >> Steven >> >> >> On Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:05:17 +0200, Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org> >> wrote: >> >>> Yes, it should be UI Common. >>> >>> The idea was, for hint and label, to support `appearance="minimal"`. >>> There is an example for hint in the spec: >>> >>> <hint appearance="minimal">Last, First</hint> >>> >>> It does make sense to have this too: >>> >>> <label appearance="minimal"> >>> >>> Like for hint, the label should/could then be rendered as a >>> placeholder. Maybe the spec should provide an example too. >>> >>> -Erik >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 3:26 AM, Steven Pemberton >>> <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>> Section 8.1 >>>> >>>> https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_XForms_Core_Form_Controls_Module >>>> says that <label> etc have as attribute sets: Common, Single Item >>>> Binding >>>> (author-optional) >>>> >>>> But section 8.2.1 >>>> https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#ui-commonelems-label >>>> says that they have Common Attributes: Common, UI Common, Single Item >>>> Binding (author-optional) >>>> >>>> So which is right? Can you say <label appearance="full"> or not? >>>> >>>> Steven
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2014 09:59:48 UTC