- From: Erik Bruchez <erik@bruchez.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:56:11 -0700
- To: Public Forms <public-forms@w3.org>
All, A few comments: 1. The reference to Core Form Controls was in the source but didn't show. I fixed it. [1] 2. "the IDREF may not uniquely identify the desired dialog if the dialog element bearing the matching ID resides in a repeating construct such as element repeat" however we say the element is a "top level container form control". 3. Since `xf:dialog` is new, do we want to support `xf:show/xf:dialog`, since we have AVTs? 4. It would be convenient if `xf:dialog/@dialog` was indeed optional, but would resolve, when possible, to the enclosing dialog. 5. Minor edits. [1] I wanted to do more, but some of the funny wording is used by group and switch too. I think readers are familar with the notion of a dialog, so I simplified a bit. 6. I had suggested `xforms-dialog-shown` and `xforms-dialog-hidden` as notification event names [3]. Right now, the text has `xforms-dialog-show` and `xforms-dialog-hide` as events dispatched by the action. One issue is: what happens with the dialog's "hide" button when present? There has to be a way to know that the dialog was hidden. Should we say that the button dispatches `xforms-dialog-show`? And/or should we have both show/hide and shown/hidden, one being the event for the action, the other one the event dispatched to the dialog when it is effectively opening/closing? 7. We had a question of what to do when the dialog becomes non-relevant, but I think that goes away as right now we say the dialog is only a top-level element. -Erik [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3815&oldid=3814 [2] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3814&oldid=3813 [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2013Jan/0021.html On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> wrote: > Hi, > > To progress on action item 1951, I incorporated the Dialog module in the > main spec > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/index.php?title=XForms_2.0&diff=3813&oldid=3802 > or http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#The_XForms_Dialog_Module > for the version without diff marking. > > Please review. > > Kind regards, > > Nick Van den Bleeken > R&D Manager > > Phone: +32 3 425 41 02 > Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71 > nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com > www.inventivedesigners.com > > > ________________________________ > > Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: > http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2013 00:56:58 UTC