Nick & all,
I guess Steven, Leigh, or John are qualified to answer the question on
dates.
I plan to spend some time reviewing the document, but it is a big task ;) I
also think that doing some kind of editorial meeting might be a good idea.
-Erik
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Nick Van den Bleeken <
Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> First of all some things that we really need to agree on before I can
> generate the spec html:
> * What is the date that needs to be put on the document
> * How many days do we accept comments? Currently I used 42 days
>
> I spent today fixing the import errors in the base document (which we
> also did in the XForms 2.0 wiki document) to get a better result in the
> diff version of the spec. If we are doing it for real it has to start from
> the generated spec html, but for now I'm running it directly from the wiki
> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXForms_2.0_base&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FMarkUp%2FForms%2Fwiki%2FXForms_2.0#Remove_Nodeset<http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0_base&doc2=http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/XForms_2.0#Remove_Nodeset>
>
>
> Could you all review the changes that were made in the XForms 2.0
> document? Also having a look at the new text in the XPath Expression module
> would be really appreciated
> https://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Group/Drafts/WD-xforms-xpath-20120504/
>
> I would have been a bit more comfortable that we had a 3 day FtF meeting
> to go over the changes, and maybe add some small features that are almost
> ready to port from the wiki to the XForms spec. But as Leigh pointed out
> our charter is almost expired...
>
>
> Steven,
>
> What are the next step that I have to do to get the document published?
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Nick Van den Bleeken
> R&D Manager
>
> Phone: +32 3 425 41 02
> Office fax: +32 3 821 01 71
> nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com
> www.inventivedesigners.com
>
>
>
> On 27 Mar 2012, at 20:06, Leigh L Klotz Jr wrote:
>
> Our charter nominally expires March 30. While we can get an extension,
> we should surely go to FPWD before them.
>
> Can we resolve to go to FPWD this week?
>
> *If you cannot attend by phone, could you please attend by IRC so we can
> be sure of having a quorum, so we can meet our charter dates.*
>
> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2009/charter2010.html
>
> Leigh.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
> http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
>
