- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 14:41:39 -0800
- To: "Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <Leigh.Klotz@Xerox.com>
- Cc: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFA465FA15.69F2E168-ON88257999.007B84E1-88257999.007CAB56@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Everyone, Previously I said it was more important for XPath 1 to be *required* to implement under XForms 1.2, whereas for XForms 2.0 it is OK to go down to [*recommended* + allowed to be supported by XPath 2 compat mode]. While it is true that XPath 2 came out a long time ago, we do still need a gentler transition for XForms 1.1 content, which is xpath 1 focused. I remain unclear what is the big blob of work that is being avoided by ripping out the lion's share of the work already done to be clear about xpath 1 works with XForms 2. I also think there are perhaps a few things that will come to mind as being appropriate for XPath 1 only, but then I still have a lowest-common-denominator expectation that those same forms will work when someone does use an XForms 2.0 + XPath 2 processor. One that comes to mind is the eval-in-context() function. In Xpath 2 you don't need this because the grammar of XPath 2 fixes a grammatic limitation in XPath 1. But, if I want to write a form that also works in XForms 2 + XPath 1 processor, then I would use the eval-in-context() function. Hasn't the bulk of the work already been done by Nick to handle both? Why get rid of it? Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Distinguished Engineer, IBM Forms and Smarter Web Applications IBM Canada Software Lab, Victoria E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/johnboyerphd Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw From: "Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <Leigh.Klotz@Xerox.com> To: public-forms@w3.org Date: 01/02/2012 09:08 AM Subject: Draft minutes for 2012-02-01 Please respond with corrections. Please start new threads for discussion. [attachment "2012-02-01.html" deleted by John Boyer/CanWest/IBM]
Received on Friday, 3 February 2012 22:43:31 UTC