Re: access to XHTML+XForms 1.1 file directory

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:01:45 +0200, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>> I've uploaded Leigh's XHTML + XForms 1.1 zip file to the following
>> location:
>> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xhtml_xforms11.zip
>
> It's there. Why did you choose 2007 instead of 2010?
>
> JB> Good question. I didn't even look in 2010 because the rest of the
> XForms 1.1 schema stuff is in 2007.
> However, now that I look, I see you have other xhtml+xforms11 stuff in
> 2010, so I'll move it there.
> Perhaps we should create a schema directory in our space, rather than
> using year numbers.

Sure. I've created http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/Schema

>> However, the action item actually asked for the zip file to also be
>> broken
>> out into the individual files.  I don't really know why, but I did the
>> extraction, which put the files here:
>> http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2007/xhtml+xforms11/
>
> They are there.
>
> JB> I know. I see them.  It's just that I can't list them.
>
>> Next I added a link to our home page.
>>
>> However, the link is not accessible due to insufficient access
>> privileges.
>
> The problem is that there is no Overview.html page, so you can only link
> to the individual files in the directory. Otherwise you should add an
> Overview.html. The directory and all files are world readable.
>
> JB> Is there anything that can be changed so that you just get a  
> directory
> listing?  I don't want to have to create a page that lists the files that
> are there, in case they change for example.

I think the easiest way to list a directory is:

 http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/2010/*,access

(See http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms,tools)

>>  Steven, I think a team member has to change the access privileges on
> new
>> directories, so could you please make the new directory available?
>>
>> While at it, would you mind creating 2010 and 2011 directories that we
>> can use for future work?
>
> 2010 is already there (again, no Overview.html file). I just created  
> 2011,
> but for some reason it is not showing up. It may be a mirroring issue,  
> and we just have to wait for the mirrors to catch up.
>
> JB> I checked this morning and 2011 is still not there from a CVS
> standpoint, so it's perhaps not just a mirroring issue.

Yep. As I said in another mail, it is because 2011 was empty. Now fixed.

Steven

Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 09:50:08 UTC