- From: Nick Van den Bleeken <Nick.Van.den.Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 22:40:47 +0200
- To: "public-forms@w3.org" <public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <98F519CDC2FA6146AE00069E9A1D91FD8707577B94@erganix.dc.intranet>
All, When moving the xf:parse() function to a separate page (together with xf:serialize()) I realized that I should have a look to the XPath 2.1 functions [1]. And yes, both functions are in the new version of XPath and XQuery Functions and Operators 1.1 [2]. So I'm not that sure anymore that we should add those functions to our spec. Maybe we could create a section that explains how an XForms implementation that has an XPath 1.0 processor could/should implement the functions from the XPath and XQuery Functions and Operators 1.0 and 1.1 (there would be limitations but I think this could be a step stone from XPath 1.0 to XPath 2.0. Regards, Nick Van den Bleeken R&D Manager Phone: +32 3 821 01 70 Office Fax: +32 3 821 01 71 nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com <mailto:nick.van.den.bleeken@inventivegroup.com> http://www.inventivedesigners.com<http://www.inventivedesigners.com/> Linked in<http://be.linkedin.com/in/nvdbleek> 1: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-11/ 2: http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-functions-11/#func-parse ________________________________ Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --
Received on Thursday, 8 July 2010 20:41:52 UTC