- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:14:56 +0200
- To: "Steven Pemberton" <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
- Cc: XForms <public-forms@w3c.org>
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:05:11 +0200, Steven Pemberton <Steven.Pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:50:09 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: >> E.g. HTML5 has a readystatechange event that is dispatched on the >> Document object. It does not need to refer to XMLHttpRequest for that >> or vice versa. They are separate events that just happen to have the >> same name and all the same properties. > > This is fine if they are identically named and have identical semantics. They don't have identical semantics. That is, the readystatechange events are dispatched for very different reasons. > But if the semantics diverge and they then both turn up in the same DOM, > you're in deep porridge. This is one of the values of defining one thing > once. I certainly agree with the general idea of defining common things once. But is that really the case here? The processing model for XForms and HTML Forms is quite different. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 11:16:23 UTC