- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:35:06 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF94183DFC.B82AC58C-ON8825765C.00656174-8825765C.006618A5@ca.ibm.com>
With respect to the action item on myself and Erik to investigate xsd:normalizedString due to an email [1] to the group, I checked with C. M. Sperberg-McQueen and Noah Mendelsohn, whose answers were consistent. Net-net, whether or not the tests of normalizedString are correct depends on a decision we have not really made about how to consume XML Schema. Michael commented that it is unfortunate there is no list of "things to consider" when consuming schema into another technology. However, in this case both he and Noah indicated that a schema technology consumer is much more likely to agree with the authors of [1] that the "invalid" case is not invalid because the strings are normalized before validity checking because this makes it easier to simply consume a COTS schema engine. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Sep/0008.html Cheers, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 20:54:36 UTC