- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:39:57 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <e81b48eb0910271339s72f05efft48654eb2637c2456@mail.gmail.com>
I have some feedback from Eric van der Vlist as well, maybe we can briefly discuss during tomorrow's call. -Erik On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:42 PM, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote: > > Testing... > > ----- Forwarded by John Boyer/CanWest/IBM on 10/27/2009 12:42 PM ----- > From: John Boyer/CanWest/IBM To: public-forms@w3.org Date: 10/27/2009 > 11:35 AM Subject: xsd:normalizedString > ------------------------------ > > > With respect to the action item on myself and Erik to investigate > xsd:normalizedString due to an email [1] to the group, I checked with C. M. > Sperberg-McQueen and Noah Mendelsohn, whose answers were consistent. > Net-net, whether or not the tests of normalizedString are correct depends > on a decision we have not really made about how to consume XML Schema. > Michael commented that it is unfortunate there is no list of "things to > consider" when consuming schema into another technology. However, in this > case both he and Noah indicated that a schema technology consumer is much > more likely to agree with the authors of [1] that the "invalid" case is not > invalid because the strings are normalized before validity checking because > this makes it easier to simply consume a COTS schema engine. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-forms/2009Sep/0008.html > > Cheers, > John M. Boyer, Ph.D. > STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications > Chair, W3C Forms Working Group > Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software > IBM Victoria Software Lab > E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com > > Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer > Blog RSS feed: > http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw > > >
Received on Tuesday, 27 October 2009 20:40:56 UTC