- From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:47:46 -0700
- To: "Erik Bruchez" <ebruchez@orbeon.com>, "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>
I think we should not be narrowly focused when adding language features, and it's quite likely that people will use modeless dialogs as containers for interactive content. Leigh. -----Original Message----- From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Erik Bruchez Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 8:21 PM To: Forms WG Subject: Re: Some questions about dialogs You mean using dialogs as portlets? I am not sure that's very compatible with their intent. -Erik On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:39 AM, Klotz, Leigh wrote: > I agree on not adding complexity before we know more but I'd hestitate > to say that multiple dialog instantiations would be rare. > We may find them as useful as portlets. > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Erik Bruchez > Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 10:40 AM > To: Forms WG > Subject: Re: Some questions about dialogs > > Nick / all, > >> Until we know better how we will handle components I will write the >> text so that only one instance of a dialog can be open at once. > > I also think now that it is better not to add all that complexity to > the specification and implementation, for a feature which will be used > only very rarely. > > Further, we are not closing the door to supporting this in the future > if really needed. > > -Erik > > -- > Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way > http://www.orbeon.com/ > > -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 18:49:25 UTC