- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:58:08 -0800
- To: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
All, This test in particular still uses the construct: <xforms:output> <xforms:label>...</xforms:label> </xforms:output> I am not sure why in the first place so many tests use this construct, for two reasons: 1. There is usually a better alternative. Here, the label can be placed on the enclosing xforms:group. 2. It is not 100% clear to me that xforms:output show allow having no single-node binding AND no @value attribute, even though the spec does not explicitly disallow it. If the spec is to allow it, a note should be added to clarify this possibility, but even so the use case for this is not clear to me. We changed a series of tests along those lines last week during the f2f, and I recommend changing this particular test 3.3.2.h as well, to use the form: <xforms:group> <xforms:label>... </xforms:label> ... </xforms:group> -Erik -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 18:58:50 UTC