- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:58:08 -0800
- To: Forms WG <public-forms@w3.org>
All,
This test in particular still uses the construct:
<xforms:output>
<xforms:label>...</xforms:label>
</xforms:output>
I am not sure why in the first place so many tests use this construct,
for two reasons:
1. There is usually a better alternative. Here, the label can be
placed on the enclosing xforms:group.
2. It is not 100% clear to me that xforms:output show allow having no
single-node binding AND no @value attribute, even though the spec
does not explicitly disallow it. If the spec is to allow it, a note
should be added to clarify this possibility, but even so the use
case for this is not clear to me.
We changed a series of tests along those lines last week during the
f2f, and I recommend changing this particular test 3.3.2.h as well, to
use the form:
<xforms:group>
<xforms:label>... </xforms:label>
...
</xforms:group>
-Erik
--
Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way
http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 18:58:50 UTC