- From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 09:56:40 -0700
- To: public-forms@w3.org
John,
Sure, I will write an example.
-Erik
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:12 AM, John Boyer<boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Erik.
> I tweaked the editor's note a bit more to suggest that the use of names from
> XML Events 2 is conditional on it being amended to represent all three of
> the states. For the benefit of other readers, this may have already happened
> in an editor's draft, but we didn't check yet.
>
> As this continues to mature toward spec text, one would think an example
> would be added (the surest way to ensure we also get an explicit test case).
> In that case, I would suggest the very first example should be listening
> for an event of some kind and running an action only
> if="event('eventPhase')='AT_TARGET'".
>
> Would you be willing to develop and add such an example?
>
> Thanks,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM, Interactive Documents and Web 2.0 Applications
> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
> Blog RSS feed:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
>
>
>
>
> From: Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com>
> To: public-forms@w3.org
> Date: 08/05/2009 10:20 AM
> Subject: Action 2009-08-5.2 (event context information updates)
> ________________________________
>
>
> All,
>
> I have made the changes to as per today's call. [1]
>
> -Erik
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/wiki/EventContextInfo
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 16:57:39 UTC