- From: Charles F Wiecha <wiecha@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 09:58:41 -0500
- To: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>, public-forms@w3.org, public-forms-request@w3.org, Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <unl@dreamlab.net>
- Message-ID: <OF107026BA.49882CF7-ON85257504.00523942-85257504.00523A62@us.ibm.com>
"XForms--" (sorry, need a bit of humor today)...Charlie
Charles Wiecha
Manager, Multichannel Web Interaction
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
P.O. Box 704
Yorktown Heights, N.Y. 10598
Phone: (914) 784-6180, T/L 863-6180, Cell: (914) 320-2614
wiecha@us.ibm.com
From: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
To: Ulrich Nicolas Lissé <unl@dreamlab.net>, "John Boyer" <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: public-forms@w3.org
Date: 11/17/2008 09:50 AM
Subject: Re: Straw poll on name of "streamlined syntax" spec
Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org
On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 10:58:55 +0100, Ulrich Nicolas Lissé
<unl@dreamlab.net> wrote:
>
> I prefer XFormsA and oppose to FormsA
>
> Even more I'd prefer something like XForms Basic, but that's already in
> use for a profile. I find the uppercase "A" a bit awkward, but a
> lowercase "a" is even more awkward, and "-a" is expected to perform
> badly in terms of Google searches. Maybe XForms Compact could do the
> trick.
XForms Transitional?
XForms Bridge?
("If all design work was done by paving cowpaths, no one would ever build
any bridges" - Steven Pemberton, 2008)
Steven
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Monday, 17 November 2008 15:03:28 UTC