- From: <Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 18:07:32 +0200
- To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Cc: XForms <public-forms@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <OF8C695549.3D88A638-ONC1257442.0057ADC5-C1257442.005892B6@inventivegroup.com>
Hi John, We finished the call a bit earlier then normal, but we were a bit short on participants (only Charlie, Nick_van_den_Bleeken, wellsk, Rafael where present)... We weren't able to tackle the following items: * Submission Validation issue : We thought the extra event context info with the value that isn't valid is easy, but didn't know how to solve the CSS problem * Dynamic dependencies : We think that a further look to the dependency engine is required, but there were no candidates I will reply to the recursive tree display message We resolved to add a wrapper element called form (with action and method attributes), Charlie and I just thought of the element just implying a model and not being a model, to enable us to move nested models requirement to XForms 2.0 (the events will capture and bubble to the implicit model which is a child of the form element. I will look-up the spec ready text related to 'Implied submission with form tag and/or with submit' and will add some text for the implied submission created by the action and method attribute on the form element. Regards, Nick Van den Bleeken - Research & Development Manager Inventive Designers Phone: +32 - 3 - 8210170 Fax: +32 - 3 - 8210171 Email: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer = -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 16:08:10 UTC