- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 09:11:19 -0700
- To: "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Cc: "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org>, "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Message-ID: <OFF3E90B23.A1A1329C-ON8825743A.0057A46F-8825743A.0058EE79@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Steven and Mark, This attribute refactoring seems to be getting a little out of hand, eh? The concern with 'target', which I still don't entirely agree is a problem but will let rest, is that it could be reused in the future to mean something different *within the submission element*. RDFa injects metadata on an element from the outside, which appears to be different than what happens with *local* attributes. RDFa needs to have a prefixing methodology so that its contributions can be distinguished from the local attributes of an element. This can be done with actual XML namespaces or, in scenarios where XML namespaces are not... preferred, by pseudo-namespacing with a dash-separated prefix such as rdfa- The resource attribute is a case in point for why it is RDFa that needs modification. XForms 1.1 is already in CR, and the implementability of the attribute when named resource is not in question. But more importantly, we used the name resource for consistency with the load action, which has been part of a W3C Recommendation since 2003. Still more, we got the name from XLink. Surely, the name in XForms should be allowed to stand... John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw "Mark Birbeck" <mark.birbeck@x-port.net> Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org 04/29/2008 03:11 AM To "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> cc "Forms WG" <public-forms@w3.org> Subject Re: @resource (was Re: Renaming target attribute of submission) Damn...well-spotted. :) 2008/4/29 Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>: > > Running through my slides for my forthcoming XForms tutorial at XTech, it > struck me that if we are worrying about @target now, we should be worrying > about @resource as well, since @resource is part of RDFa, and therefore will > be appearing everywhere in XHTML documents soon: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#rdfa-attributes > > Steven > > -- Mark Birbeck mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.x-port.net | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com x-port.net Ltd. is registered in England and Wales, number 03730711 The registered office is at: 2nd Floor Titchfield House 69-85 Tabernacle Street London EC2A 4RR
Received on Tuesday, 29 April 2008 16:12:11 UTC