- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 17:34:13 -0700
- To: Forms WG (new) <public-forms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFE841CD68.23D0AA37-ON88257426.0002398B-88257426.000326BD@ca.ibm.com>
We have a good basis for the streamlined syntax [1] [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2008Mar/0097.html However, there are now follow-up issues to address: 1) What should "implied" submission look like? I think the overall form structure looks like this <form action="some URL" ...> optional expressed instances optional expressed submissions optional expressed binds all of the above may optionally be wrapped by a model element? form controls as in [1] above </form> The form tag is needed as the container for the set of things that will be generated into an implied model. The action attribute would imply an XForms replace all submission in that model. The implied method should be in accord with the default method for HTML. The implied serialization should be the default for HTML. It should be possible to add the serialization attribute to ask for the XML of the implied instance. 2) What will be the relationship between expressed instances and the generated instance? I think that you can express all the instances you want, but you get a generated instance if you use 'name' attributes in your form controls. If you want to switch from implied instance to expressed instance, then you have to run a converter program on your form. 3) What is the relationship between expressed model(s) and the implied model? I think we need to keep the notion of "nested models" in XForms 1.2, and we should regard models within form tag as inner models. Anything else? Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. Senior Technical Staff Member Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Blog RSS feed: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/rss/JohnBoyer?flavor=rssdw
Received on Wednesday, 9 April 2008 00:35:43 UTC