Hi John, On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:06 AM, John Boyer wrote: > > It remains unclear *to me*. > As explained, it remains unclear *because* the vote preempts the > work of a task force both groups were obligated by charter to form > to *work together* toward a solution. > > So, you held a vote in which the working group said it did not want > to do what it is chartered to do, so are you saying that the vote > means the HTML WG should be dissolved? > That's a bit of hyperbole, but it illustrates what I think is the > analogous hyperbole of suggesting that the task force be dissolved > because some within it do not even want to consider the notion that > a more technically precise approach might actually still align with > their HTML WG goals. Extremism obstructs meaningful collaboration. > Meaningful collaboration obstructs extremism. If you think the HTML WG violated its charter in adopting a particular forms spec as its basis for review (note, not a final document), then I guess you should take it up with the HTML WG Co-Chairs. I do not believe the case, but I am not sure it is worth debating within the context of the Forms TF. You may wish to indicate to them which part of the HTML WG Charter you feel is violated: <http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter.html >. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 3 April 2008 16:57:22 UTC