W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-forms@w3.org > October 2007

Re: Question about ValueTemplate in Schema

From: <Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:23:03 +0100
To: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
Cc: Forms WG (new) <public-forms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF99EFEF24.C7860E4A-ONC1257383.0028310C-C1257383.00288F1A@inventivegroup.com>


Your change looks good for me, as I mentioned before I started working on 
the schema, I had no experience in writing schema, so that is why I used 
mixed="true" instead of your solution.
I defined the type because a ValueTemplate is used more the once, and I 
didn't want to repeat the construct so if changes were needed to the 
definition we could change it at one place.


Nick Van den Bleeken  -  Research & Development
Inventive Designers
Phone: +32 - 3 - 8210170
Fax: +32 - 3 - 8210171
Email: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com

John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote on 10/25/2007 03:29:58 AM:

> Hi Nick, 
> I don't understand why you defined ValueTemplate thus: 
>         <xsd:complexType name="ValueTemplate" mixed="true"> 
>                 <xsd:attribute name="value" type="xforms:
> XPathExpression" use="optional"/> 
>         </xsd:complexType> 
> I understand why you defined it (so you wouldn't have to write the 
> same stuff over again), but this particular definition seems to 
> allow the content of toggle/case, setfocus/control, load/resource, 
> submission/resource to be other than character data. 
> mixed seems to allow a mixture of characters and elements, whereas 
> we want the content of these elements to be use when there is no 
> value attribute. 
> Wouldn't it be better to define it more like it is defined for the 
> setvalue action, e.g. this: 
>                 <xsd:complexType name="ValueTemplate"> 
>                         <xsd:simpleContent> 
>                                 <xsd:extension base="xsd:string"> 
>                                         <xsd:attribute name="value" 
> type="xforms:XPathExpression" use="optional"/> 
>                                 </xsd:extension> 
>                         </xsd:simpleContent> 
>                 </xsd:complexType> 
> I'm going to risk it and make the change to this latter form now, 
> but please tell me whether or not this is a good idea... 
> Thank you, 
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
> STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
> Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
> Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
> IBM Victoria Software Lab
> E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com 
> Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer


Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:

Received on Monday, 29 October 2007 07:23:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:26 UTC