- From: Blake Jones <blake.jones@ViewPlus.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 09:38:22 -0700
- To: "Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- CC: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4703C57E.3080607@ViewPlus.com>
Hi Leigh, the Oregon phone number was for me--not sure why Zakim kept it. BTW, you listed my last name incorrectly (s/b Jones). Thx, Blake Leigh L. Klotz, Jr. wrote: > If your name is not listed and you phoned in, please let me know. > One unidentified number from Oregon (US) was listed, perhaps a VOIP or > corporate trunk link? > > For corrections on the minutes, please reply to the list. > To discuss the content, please start a new thread. > > Leigh. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > W3C Forms teleconference October 3, 2007 > > > * <#topic0> Present > > Keith Wells, IBM > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer, DreamLabs > John Boyer, IBM (chair) > Charlie Wiecha, IBM > Mark Seaborne, PicoForms > Nick van den Bleeken, Inventive Designers > Steven Pemberton, CWI/W3C > Leigh Klotz, Xerox (minutes) > Rafael Benito, SATEC > Blake John, ViewPlus Technologies/DAISY > > > * <#topic1> Agenda > > * Previous Minutes <#topic2> > * Progress on assembling XForms @ XML 2007 announcement? <#topic3> > * Fix for dateTime math <#topic4> > * Need topics of discussion for proposed meeting with Voice group > <#topic5> > * TPAC Deadline <#topic6> > * XForms Basic <#topic7> > * Task Force <#topic8> > * Progress closing action items? <#topic9> > * Meeting Ends <#topic10> > * IRC Minutes <#topic11> > > > * <#topic2> Previous minutes: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Sep/0094.html IRC > supplement: http://www.w3.org/2007/09/26-forms-minutes.html > > > * <#topic3> Progress on assembling XForms @ XML 2007 announcement? > > John Boyer: Steven, can we get the abstract page ready for me to post > in the database that Dave Megginson sent us. > Steven Pemberton: Leigh? > Leigh Klotz: Yes, I have them in > http://del.icio.us/leighklotz/xforms+paper+submission > John Boyer: I changed my abstract not to say "proposed". > Leigh Klotz: Should we do that? > John Boyer: I think so. Also contact and ask for photos. > > Action 2007-10-3.1: <#ACTION1> Leigh Klotz to edit abstracts and ask > authors for photos for XForms @ XML 2007. > > Action 2007-10-3.2: <#ACTION2> Steven Pemberton to post final > abstracts for XForms Day to XML 2007 database that Dave Megginson will > provide John Boyer. > > > * <#topic4> Fix for dateTime math > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-forms/2007Oct/0003.html > > John Boyer: Two fixes, to add optional date-time parameters to deal > with calculating "two hours from now" in the same way we calculate > "two days from now." > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#fn-seconds-from-dateTime > The boolean defaults to true (as in XForms 1.0) using UTC time, but > false makes the seconds-from-dateTime calculation in the current time > zone. > > Nick van: Adding the boolean makes seconds-from-dateTime incompatible > with XPath 2.0. > John Boyer: What about seconds-to-dateTime? > Nick van: That's not in XPath 2.0. > John Boyer: That's a good point. The critical one is > seconds-to-dateTime. > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#fn-seconds-to-dateTime > Nick van: They have another way to do that. > John Boyer: They have natural date math functionality. I found I > couldn't calculate "two hours from now" in a single calculate. If you > look at the examples, you can see I don't need the parameter on > seconds-from-dateTime. > Steven Pemberton: [irc] Ugh > John Boyer: Yes, Steven, XPath 2.0 will be better. But if you look in > the email, you'll see that without this parameter, you have to have > four binds and two or three local instance date variables to calculate > "two hours from now." At a minimum, if we can keep the optional > boolean parameter, days-to-date(days-from-date(local-date()) + 31) > will add 31 days. > Leigh Klotz: So the issue is that now returns UTC? > John Boyer: The issue is seconds-to-dateTime, which is not capable of > returning a local date. > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.1/index-diff.html#fn-seconds-to-dateTime > You will see that seconds-to-dateTime produces a UTC dateTime. > Steven Pemberton: You can say that again. > John Boyer: [repeats] > Steven Pemberton: No, I mean I agree with you entirely. > Nick van: I agree that we need something to convert to local > timezones, but boolean is a bit...it is not such expected behavior. It > feels a bit of a hack. In fact what you really want is conversions > between timezones, as in XPath 2.0. Maybe it's a bit too much to ask. > You could have a convert timezone function to localtime. > Leigh Klotz: It seems to me a function that would convert from UTC to > localtime would do the same thing but be discoverable. > Nick van: Those are all in XPath 2.0. > John Boyer: I agree that XPath 2.0 would be nicer and I could go for > seconds-to-localDateTime. If we do nothing, we have to do all this... > Leigh Klotz: I think a separate function is better. It doesn't have to > be totally generic if XPath 2.0's, is; we can just do convert to > localtime. > John Boyer: Yes, and in part because modifying seconds-from-dateTime > isn't a good idea. > Nick van: [irc] > http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/#func-adjust-dateTime-to-timezone > John Boyer: So we could just have adjust-dateTime-to-localtime. > Nick van: I wanted to do this, but we are trying to add not too much > stuff that isn't in XPath 2.0. > John Boyer: We're about to go to a call for implementations and this > looks easy to implement. > Nick van: I can live with it. > John Boyer: So the proposal is to add a adjust-dateTime-to-localtime > function. > Leigh Klotz: The XPath 2.0 function has lots of cases to consider, > empty, no timezone etc. > John Boyer: Yes, we'll have to have similar language. > John Boyer: [irc] Proposal: add a convert-to-local-dateTime; Similar > language about edge cases as well as main case of converting from UTC > to local (if timezone info known by impl) > Leigh Klotz: I'd say that it should handle all timezones in the date, > just as in seconds-from-dateTime. > John Boyer: What if it isn't specified? > Leigh Klotz: It says just append the timezone if the timezone is > unspecified. > Nick van: I would say we can just use the XPath function without the > optional timezone arg. > Leigh Klotz: It's called adjust-dateTime-to-timezone and they have it > defined without the timezone parameter as well. > John Boyer: That would probably make Erik happy. Anybody unhappy with > that? So resolved. > > Resolution 2007-10-3.1: <#resolution1> We adopt > adjust-dateTime-to-timezone from > http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/#func-adjust-dateTime-to-timezone > in the single-parameter version only. > > Action 2007-10-3.3: <#ACTION3> John Boyer to adopt > adjust-dateTime-to-timezone from > http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-operators/#func-adjust-dateTime-to-timezone > in the single-parameter version only for XForms 1.1. > > > * <#topic5> Need topics of discussion for proposed meeting with > Voice group > > John Boyer: What topics? > Steven Pemberton: Harmonizing forms; they have their own HTML-like > forms. Also, harmonizing events, though possibly that is backplane. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: Is this for the all-group meeting? > John Boyer: It came up at the F2F. We decided to request the meeting. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: What's the reason for the request? > Steven Pemberton: I'd like to discuss the HTML approach vs the XML > approach. > John Boyer: Charlie? > Steven Pemberton: What was in the minutes. > > > * <#topic6> TPAC Deadline > > Steven Pemberton: Today is the final deadline for the F2F hotel deadline. > John Boyer: We really need you at the F2F meetings. > > > * <#topic7> XForms Basic > > Steven Pemberton: what is the status? > Leigh Klotz: I'm waiting for the test suite to be updated to PicoForms > to test. > Keith Wells: The changes should be in place. The v3 test suite was > updated two days ago. Can we get the updated link posted John? > John Boyer: Yes. > Steven Pemberton: Where is the link > Keith Wells: In my email this morning. > > Action 2007-10-3.4: <#ACTION4> John Boyer to update v3 test suite link > from home page. > > John Boyer: Which test suite are they trying to create an > implementation report against? > Steven Pemberton: We are using PicoForms for PR for XForms Basic. > Which edition are you using? Third edition? > Mark Seaborne: I think we are using second. > John Boyer: Leigh, have you seen the implementation report? > Leigh Klotz: I've not seen it. I was preparing to ask for one. > Steven Pemberton: I've seen a spreadsheet with reports of basic vs. not. > Leigh Klotz: I don't care where it comes from, but I am not doing the > test of PicoForms myself. I just need to produce the document. > Steven Pemberton: Mark Seaborne, can I ask you to contact Leigh and > get him what he needs? > John Boyer: Which edition does it reference for PicoForms? > Leigh Klotz: It could refer to any one we want I suppose. Whatever > PicoForms implements and tests is the version that we can advance to PR. > John Boyer: Mark, can you let us know what version PicoForms will be > testing and get an implementation report to Leigh? > Mark Seaborne: Sure. > > Action 2007-10-3.5: <#ACTION5> Mark Seaborne to let us know what > version PicoForms will be testing and get an implementation report for > XForms 1.0 Basic Profile to Leigh Klotz? > > John Boyer: Keith, can you send mail with links to the messages from > David Landwehr (see IRC) and report they are fixed? > Keith Wells: I did that. > > > * <#topic8> Task Force > > Steven Pemberton: What is the status? > Nick van: There is a proposal for the charter from Anne. It's quite > vague but it's a start. There is some movement on either a phone call > or a tech plenary meeting. It is moving again. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: Yes. I am not showing up but that is a red > herring, but I should be there. I introduced myself today. There's a > question about which wiki version. > Steven Pemberton: I'll either use our existing wiki or use the new one > if it's available. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: I think Anne's just asking for web space > for storing documents, not necessarily a wiki; maybe he can just get > space from Chris Lilley <http://www.w3.org/People/all#chris>. > Nick van: Then only he can edit it? > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: No, it would be access public. But we need > to confirm. > John Boyer: Once the space is set up, let us know and we'll link to it. > > > * <#topic9> Progress closing action items? > > John Boyer: Submission examples from Steven? Will you be able to give > us some examples? > Steven Pemberton: Yes, I'll do that Friday. > > John Boyer: Uli reported that he is working on the insert/delete > examples. Hopefully some of you have had a chance to look at the first > four; they're more intelligible than our past ones. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: Did Uli do the past ones? > John Boyer: He did a good job to start, but I asked for a couple of > other adjustments on the presentment to make the general pattern > obvious at the beginning. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: I'll tell Uli. > > Nick van: For readonly examples, do we want them in the same format as > for insert? The data before and after will be the same. > John Boyer: How many examples do you have? > Nick van: I have ... > John Boyer: We don't have to go as wild as we did on insert/delete, > because we had a last call comment to document common usage patterns, > and it feeds XForms 1.2 and turn them into new vocabulary to > streamline "append an element," "prepend an element," "duplicate," > etc. with an exact ... More like Uli's original format would be > sufficient. > Nick van: I did the same as the other examples. > John Boyer: If there's anything to be done other than wiring them in > we'll correspond. > > John Boyer: The Schema...Nick did a lot but there's one left. > Charlie Wiecha: That's me, actions > Leigh Klotz: What about the unnecessary toplevel elements? > Nick van: New ones are local and old ones are left toplevel. > John Boyer: We can put together a better schema as time goes on. Jan > created a version of the Schema that did move some elements away from > being toplevel, so maybe we could take a look at that. I think Mark > Birbeck is working on a highly-modularized Schema and there was some > concern that it was using features that some Schema engines wouldn't > support; I'm prepared to believe it but it seems fishy. > Leigh Klotz: I think this is our last chance to say that label can't > go just anywhere, or put it in group. > John Boyer: That's why the schema isn't normative any more; the main > body of the document doesn't say that. Also we said that the > submission children could be in any order. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: The validation battle is lost. > John Boyer: I don't think runtimes are using it, but it's helpful for > validation. > Leigh Klotz: Really all we need out of it is the data types. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: Technically we could, but I think we shouldn't. > Leigh Klotz: We could use an RNG Schema. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: Someone should write one. > Leigh Klotz: In fact we have an RNG Schema. Micah wrote one and I'm an > editor of it. > Sebastian Schnitzenbaumer: Let's talk about it. > Leigh Klotz: Next time. > > > * <#topic10> Meeting Ends > > http://www.w3.org/2007/10/03-forms-minutes.html > > > * <#topic11> IRC Minutes > -- Blake Jones Software Engineer ViewPlus Technologies blake.jones@viewplus.com
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2007 16:38:44 UTC