- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:53:42 -0800
- To: ebruchez@orbeon.com
- Cc: public-forms@w3.org, public-forms-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF338BFD3B.5DEBEB0B-ON8825738B.001FBA6C-8825738B.00208D57@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Erik, It was needed today, so I completed the task. It is now approaching 1am, so I will talk to you in the morning about it if needed. For the record, we did not re-add the text in a different place. We did put aspects of the former text back *because* we lost important use cases without them, such as the ability to insert attributes. Please note that the amended text *must* still be predicated on the type of cloned node and/or the type of insert location node. It will be obvious once you review the text that this is both unavoidable and quite natural. For example, if the context attribute is used to specify the parent of the cloned node, one must still decide whether to add the cloned node to the attribute list or child list based on whether or not the cloned node is an attribute. Anyway, the result of your request (context for parent container, nodeset for sibling) has made insert easier to understand, which was the goal. We hope to discuss transition to CR in the morning, so please review by then. Thank you, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer Erik Bruchez <ebruchez@orbeon.com> Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org 11/05/2007 09:54 AM Please respond to ebruchez@orbeon.com To public-forms@w3.org cc "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org> Subject Re: 15 Insert/Delete Examples updated in Editor's draft John, > Notwithstanding whether the intent of your proposal was misunderstood, > the thing you proposed (the removal of certain text) did occur. My initial comment proposed the removal of that text with a certain intent, which was clearly explained (and re-explained in this thread). If then the content of that removed text is re-added but in a different place, then the removal obviously does nothing to achieve that intent. > Can you reformulate what you want to happen based on the latest copy of > the spec? > This will be needed for comparison. I will attempt to do this today. -Erik -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2007 05:56:02 UTC