- From: John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:57:28 -0700
- To: steven.pemberton@cwi.nl
- Cc: public-forms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF9042942E.3D789FFF-ON882572EC.0071D84C-882572EC.00732019@ca.ibm.com>
Hi Steven, I have produced updated errata documents for XForms 1.0 Second Edition. They appear here: New errata document: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.0.ThirdEdition/errata/REC-xforms-10-2ndEdition-errata.html New diff-marked errata document: http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/specs/XForms1.0.ThirdEdition/errata/REC-xforms-10-2ndEdition-errata-diff.html Please use the usual method for updating the errata: 1) Rename the current errata document so that it has a name that matches the 'previous version' link in the new document. This consists of adding the date to the name of that document. 2) Copy the new documents into place. 3) Rename the diff-marked version to one that includes the proper date suffix (-20070531) on the filename 4) Test to make sure that the new errata document (the one containing 40 errata, not 38) comes up from the XForms 1.0 Second Edition errata link, and then ensure the diff-marked version is accessible. Finally, note that this is necessary for two reasons. First, there were two more minor errata put in place for Bjoern Hoermann. Second, I noticed that the diff marking caused the text of erratum E38 to be incorrect in the non-diff-marked version of the Dec. 15 errata document. Thanks, John M. Boyer, Ph.D. STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher Chair, W3C Forms Working Group Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software IBM Victoria Software Lab E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com Blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
Received on Thursday, 31 May 2007 20:57:39 UTC