- From: <Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:10:25 +0200
- To: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Cc: ebruchez@orbeon.com, "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org>, public-forms-request@w3.org
and when using namespaces xmlns="" Nick Van den Bleeken - Research & Development Inventive Designers Phone: +32 - 3 - 8210170 Fax: +32 - 3 - 8210171 Email: Nick_Van_den_Bleeken@inventivegroup.com "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com> Sent by: public-forms-request@w3.org 07/25/2007 11:08 PM To <ebruchez@orbeon.com>, "Forms WG (new)" <public-forms@w3.org> cc Subject RE: serialization="" Just FYI we also use a "" in includenamespaceprefixes. Leigh. -----Original Message----- From: public-forms-request@w3.org [mailto:public-forms-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Erik Bruchez Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 1:48 PM To: Forms WG (new) Subject: serialization="" All, We thought about this at Orbeon and we think that using a blank value for the attribute remains awkward. It is pretty much unseen in XML-based languages out there, and it could also indicate that the developer has forgotten to put a value for the attribute. "none" is not a media type, but neither is a blank string. So I am going to be a flip-flopper here and get back to the idea that "none" is preferable to an empty attribute. -Erik -- Orbeon Forms - Web Forms for the Enterprise Done the Right Way http://www.orbeon.com/ -------------------------------------------------- Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer: http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer
Received on Thursday, 26 July 2007 12:10:29 UTC