Re: XForms 1.1 schema disarray

Hi John,

It shouldn't take me long to do the work, but I don't think I'll have
a chance to do it *before* this week's telecon. Before next week's
call should be fine, though.

All the best,

Mark

On 27/06/07, John Boyer <boyerj@ca.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> The XForms 1.1 schema does not generally seem to have much to do with XForms
> 1.1.
>
> It is a good thing I moved it from normative because it does not contain
> much of the needed content.  Can you please work at it this week and before
> the next telecon so that the new features of XForms 1.1 are available in the
> schema, and features that are not part of XForms 1.1 are removed?
>
> For example, the XForms-11-Schema.xsd file contains overrides of XForms 1.0
> as near as I can tell, but it is virtually empty, and better than 50% of its
> content refers to features not in XForms 1.1.
>
> Thanks,
> John M. Boyer, Ph.D.
>  STSM: Lotus Forms Architect and Researcher
>  Chair, W3C Forms Working Group
>  Workplace, Portal and Collaboration Software
>  IBM Victoria Software Lab
>  E-Mail: boyerj@ca.ibm.com
>
>  Blog:
> http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/JohnBoyer
>
>


-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@x-port.net | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

Received on Monday, 2 July 2007 15:31:55 UTC