- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:20:58 +0200
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: public-forms-tf@w3.org
On Wednesday, August 22, 2007, 8:42:20 PM, Maciej wrote: MS> Side note: One of Dan's quote was of an early internal version of the MS> architectural vision document. He quoted it as: MS> "The charter calls for two equivalent serializations to be developed, MS> corresponding to a single DOM (or infoset, though tag soup cannot be MS> considered to have an infoset currently, while it can have a DOM). MS> This ensures that decisions are not made which would not preclude an MS> XML serialization. It allows the two serializations to be inter- MS> converted automatically. Having new language features, there is an MS> incentive for content authors to use it; and having client-side MS> implementations means that there is the possibility to really use it." MS> However, the version of the vision document published actually says: MS> "Instead, the charter calls for two equivalent serializations to be MS> developed *by the HTML WG* [emphasis mine], corresponding to a single MS> DOM (or infoset, though tag soup cannot be considered to have an MS> infoset currently, while it can have a DOM). This ensures that MS> decisions are not made which would preclude an XML serialization. It MS> allows the two serializations to be inter-converted automatically. MS> Having new language features, there is an incentive for content MS> authors to use it; and having client-side implementations means that MS> there is the possibility to really use it." Yes. It is after all the HTML WG that is developing a document format with two serialisations, which is why the clarification was added. MS> The quote from the official version appears not to be about this task MS> force at all, but about the HTML language spec deliverable of the HTML MS> WG. MS> I mention this so we don't accidentally draw on the misquoted version MS> of the statement. But you can feel free to repurpose that language to cover the task force, if its seen as desirable. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 23 August 2007 15:21:08 UTC