- From: r12a <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 10:24:04 +0100
- To: Simon Cozens <simon@simon-cozens.org>
- Cc: 梁海 Liang Hai <lianghai@gmail.com>, public-font-text@w3.org
Received on Friday, 4 September 2020 09:24:09 UTC
Yes, i think so. For example, we in the W3C i18n activity will almost certainly want to track some of the discussions, and be automatically notified about changes. We have that automatically set up under the W3C domain. There's also a stronger guarantee for permanence of the discussion threads, which will be useful for future reference. And if the group moves forward and develops deliverables, it will create new repos, and there will be some benefits to having all the repos in the same domain. hth ri Simon Cozens wrote on 04/09/2020 09:40: > If the charter is accepted and this CG just becomes a "meeting point" > for spawning more technical issues (which I agree would benefit from > W3C tooling), do we really need all the W3C tools for *this* group?
Received on Friday, 4 September 2020 09:24:09 UTC