Re: prefer-online vs manifest association

I've filed the webkit bug here...
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97596





On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Andrew Betts <andrew.betts@ft.com> wrote:

> On 24 September 2012 10:04, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 21 September 2012 00:04, Andrew Betts <andrew.betts@ft.com> wrote:
> >> Just found something today which may be obvious and has simply passed
> >> me by, but really caught me off guard.  It seems that on pages that do
> >> not reference a manifest and are not themselves in an appcache,
> >> loading of sub-resources that are appcached may use the appcache, but
> >> only after checking the network first.
> >
> > This doesn't add up with my experience. What I've seen is pages that
> > load without appcache do not use appcache for in-page requests (imgs,
> > css, js, xhr), even if the requested file existed in an application
> > cache.
>
> Yes, apologies, I had a dim moment and then escalated it into an
> entire (evidently flawed) test suite which facilitated further
> stupidity.  Sorry.  At least I found a webkit bug in the process :-)
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------
> This email was sent by a company owned by Pearson plc, registered office at
> 80 Strand, London WC2R 0RL.  Registered in England and Wales with company
> number 53723.
>
>