- From: Michiel B. de Jong <anything@michielbdejong.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 13:37:58 +0200
- To: <public-fedsocweb@w3.org>
i think instead of creating a best practice document, we can just make
sure the wiki is complete and up-to-date:
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/federatedsocialweb/wiki/Main_Page
how do you propose to measure the relative importance of competing
protocols? shouldn't we leave that to the market to decide, instead of
trying to apply a top-down decision on that? sure, i agree that the wiki
should reflect how active each project/protocol is, we can try to give
the reader a sense of
- how many developer are currently working on/with a certain protocol?
- how many software projects/independent code bases "speak" the
protocol?
- does it pass SWAT0?
- how many servers / active user accounts support it?
i would say let's just keep giving all protocols and projects in the
ecosystem a fair chance to present themselves here, and exchange
experiences. maybe a winner will emerge, maybe not. but choosing one
through a mailinglist-vote sounds like a bad idea.
my 2ct,
Michiel de Jong.
Received on Wednesday, 8 May 2013 11:38:23 UTC