Re: Position papers / workshop Re: FSW CG now has 100 members

On 1 July 2013 10:36, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org> wrote:

> On 07/01/2013 08:51 AM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote:
>
>> Harry Halpin:
>>
>>> Just to remind people, the W3C is thinking heavily of starting
>>> standardization in this general area, but we need your position papers
>>> ASAP:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/2013/**socialweb/ <http://www.w3.org/2013/socialweb/>
>>>
>> I will not be able to travel to the US. Will it be possible to
>> participate via Internet (Open Standards preferred) ?
>>
>
> In very exceptional circumstances this has been done (we did it for Henry
> Story/WebID in 2011). However, we would prefer people to be there and will
> prioritize position papers from those that can attend in person. Feel free
> to send a Position Paper and tell us you can't attend, and we'll still post
> it to the website and encourage attendees to read it to inform the
> discussion.
>
> I do understand the US is far away, so the next event will hopefully be
> Europe-based!!
>
>
>
>
>> I noticed that the Program Committee for that workshop mostly consists
>> of people who do not seem to be active in the Federated Social Web
>> community.
>>
>
> Evan Prodromou (who helped design the Ostatus stack), Monica Wilkinson
> (ActivityStreams), and others are on the PC - along with of course,
> interested companies. If folks see any key areas missing, just email me.
>

James Snell, Brad Fitzpatrick, David Recordon, Chris Messina, Jo Smarr, Dan
Brickley may be worth inviting as I think they have done valid work in this
space.


>
>> Cheers,
>> Andreas
>>
>
>
>