Re: Dialback authentication

On 12-09-05 11:45 AM, Blaine Cook wrote:
> Following up on some feedback I've just given Evan, I think it's best
> if the "user doing something" bit should be separate from the "hosts
> negotiating a secure / shared channel.
>
> Effectively this would just mean splitting the document into two
> separate documents; one that does the host negotiation stuff, and the
> other that handles the semantics of allowing delegation. That way, if
> two hosts wanted to do their secure communication using client certs
> instead, they could do so and still use the webfinger semantics around
> "is <host> allowed to act on behalf of <user>".
>
In the interest of getting this editorial collaborative process going, 
I've taken the document on the wiki and turned it into an Internet Draft:

<http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-prodromou-dialback-00.txt>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-prodromou-dialback/

I think there's a bug tracker for handling next versions.

-Evan