- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 08:26:26 -0400
- To: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5007FCF2.2040401@openlinksw.com>
On 7/19/12 8:08 AM, Michiel de Jong wrote: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: >> On 7/19/12 6:39 AM, Michiel de Jong wrote: >>> - find out what this document is trying to tell us, >> How do you determine what the content of a document is telling you or your >> user agent? > Oh, that's the easy part, i consider that a solved problem. See > > https://github.com/unhosted/useraddress/tree/master/parser > > My question in this thread was about what to do with uni-directional > claims, not how to read the documents that make them. > > > My point is about "what to do" being another way of saying: how do I entail based on reasoning. Basically, how do I obtain actionable meaning from content. It always boils down to the semantics of the entity relationships rescribed by the overall data model . You can have a uni-directional claim on the surface that's basically a relationship with functional, inverse-functional, symmetrical, equivalence, or inverse semantics, for instance. My fundamental point is that these relationship semantics have been with us forever, so ignoring them is ultimately futile, since they aren't format / syntax specific. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Founder & CEO OpenLink Software Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Thursday, 19 July 2012 12:27:00 UTC