- From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 19:04:28 +0300
- To: Evan Prodromou <evan@status.net>
- Cc: public-fedsocweb@w3.org
Hi Evan! On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Evan Prodromou <evan@status.net> wrote: > I also think there's a strong case to be made from the social business side: > hundreds of thousands of businesses use their own social networks, and > allowing some controlled, private connections between those networks makes a > lot of sense. Absolutely, and i hope all businesses will give there employees read-write web accounts one day. We already convinced both the Dutch and the Greek government to give all students and academic staff in those two countries a remoteStorage-compatible read-write web account. But if we're going to federate, then we also need to seamlessly federate private messages. So what's your opinion about simply using smtp as a server-to-server protocol for that? I think it could be either very crazy or very sensible. :) Note that facebook is already doing it, btw, for both incoming and outgoing private messages. I just tried it and was able to send a private message from my facebook account to my google account and back. i guess Melvin is right in saying that that already /is/ the federated social web, and always has been. :)
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 16:04:55 UTC