Re: Final(?) draft of the Binary Module

Indeed that's the plan. I only want to put in the effort if others are
interested as well though. Obviously eXist would adopt this, but who else?
On 21 Sep 2013 14:39, "Florent Georges" <fgeorges@fgeorges.org> wrote:

> On 21 September 2013 15:13, Adam Retter wrote:
>
> > I am thinking of creating an abstract impl of this, whereby a
> > platform need only implement a couple interfaces.  Before I go to
> > this effort, would anyone be interested in building their
> > implementation on top of my abstract implementation?
>
>   I guess, by "abstract implementation", you mean a "Java generic"
> implementation, where all the business logic is there, but the
> connectivity to the processor (especially to its data model) is
> represented as interfaces and/or abstract methods?
>
>   As several processors are Java-based, I think that would be great to
> see several of them collaborating on the implementation side when it
> makes sense! (and I guess that it is the case here, as long as binary
> item implementations can be exposed as a byte stream)
>
> --
> Florent Georges
> http://fgeorges.org/
> http://h2oconsulting.be/
>