- From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:39:49 +0200
- To: Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>
- Cc: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, EXPath CG <public-expath@w3.org>, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
On 4 July 2013 17:35, Adam Retter wrote: > Functions should explicitly take xs:base64binary and return > xs:base64binary because that is the type used in other EXPath > specs. > What if you want xs:hexBinary? Simply, we provide conversion > functions to/from hex to base64. Yes. I start to think this is probably the most practical approach... - one single type consistently used across the spec - no custom type - specific entry points (in and out) to use other types -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 15:40:36 UTC