Re: Comment on "Allow both xs:base64Binary and xs:hexBinary as arguments" from Florent Georges on 2013-07-04 (public-expath@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:56:52 +0200
To: liam@w3.org
Cc: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, EXPath CG <public-expath@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADyR_r3-=4pEq4Qc6zYsK-Hm5T73xb5mXRMuXS1gK+wuzA4OyA@mail.gmail.com>

On 4 July 2013 14:25, Liam R E Quin wrote:

> An alternative there might be to allow hex constants, e.g. 0xa0a0a0a0.

  I don't think this is a good idea to define lexical extensions to
the language in an EXPath module.  Especially that I don't see the
benefit versus bin:hex('a0a0a0a0').

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/

Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 12:57:40 UTC