Re: Comment on "Allow both xs:base64Binary and xs:hexBinary as arguments" from Florent Georges on 2013-07-04 (public-expath@w3.org from July 2013)

From: Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 14:54:00 +0200
To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
Cc: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>, EXPath CG <public-expath@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CADyR_r3AuFSVaH866W1yYF0aoNExMJmJK_Ur5kEG1RwfK06kKg@mail.gmail.com>

On 4 July 2013 11:38, Michael Kay wrote:

> The advantage of (A) is that its unambiguous.

  Yes, it would be preference as well if we go that way (using
xs:anyAtomicType in the signature of the functions in the API).

  So in that case, the return type has to be xs:anyAtomicType as well,
to be able to return the same type as received as parameter.

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/

Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 12:54:48 UTC