- From: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:16:35 +0100
- To: Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: EXPath <public-expath@w3.org>, EXPath <expath@googlegroups.com>
> My point here is that you say something in the introduction about XSLT > **2.0** and you are referencing XSLT **3.0** > > My question is : this EXPath module is compatible with what ? > XSLT 1.0 > XSLT 2.0 > XSLT 3.0 > XQuery 1.0 > XQuery 3.0 > XForms 1.0 > XForms 1.1 > XProc 1.0 We may need to clarify this for the File and the Binary Module; both modules reference F&O 3.0 and reference XQuery 1.0 and XSLT 2.0, as well as any other XPath 2.0 in the introduction. @Jirka, @John, @Florent: what do you think? > And we should be clear with each module > > Mohamed > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi Mohamed, >> >> > And then in the Appendix A - References, you mention XSLT 3.0 and XPath >> > 3.0 >> > >> > Probably you should mention BOTH in both places >> >> The reason for the two references is that these have been quoted in >> the fn:append function: >> >> http://expath.org/spec/file#fn.append >> >> We could think about adding explicit references to the X specs in the >> introduction. >> >> > What's the plan here : do we want all the EXPath specification be >> > standalone >> > ? or do we want to avoid duplication ? >> >> This feels indeed like a good idea; maybe Florent has some thoughts about >> this? >> >> Best, >> Christian > > > > > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 15:17:26 UTC