I think it's going to be much easier for users if we let each module have its own namespace and put all the functions and error codes for that module in that namespace. Michael Kay Saxonica On 12 Dec 2013, at 15:02, Innovimax W3C <innovimax+w3c@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a general question on EXPath Module > > Are the Module supposed to be standalone or can we share a bit of information (like error codes and namespace) ? > > If we share something, can we start gathering data for a EXPath Common Module ? > > Mohamed > > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Mohamed, > > > And then in the Appendix A - References, you mention XSLT 3.0 and XPath 3.0 > > > > Probably you should mention BOTH in both places > > The reason for the two references is that these have been quoted in > the fn:append function: > > http://expath.org/spec/file#fn.append > > We could think about adding explicit references to the X specs in the > introduction. > > > What's the plan here : do we want all the EXPath specification be standalone > > ? or do we want to avoid duplication ? > > This feels indeed like a good idea; maybe Florent has some thoughts about this? > > Best, > Christian > > > > -- > Innovimax SARL > Consulting, Training & XML Development > 9, impasse des Orteaux > 75020 Paris > Tel : +33 9 52 475787 > Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 > http://www.innovimax.fr > RCS Paris 488.018.631 > SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Thursday, 12 December 2013 15:05:00 UTC