Re: EXPath binary module - comments - bin:subsequence() from Jirka Kosek on 2013-08-06 (public-expath@w3.org from August 2013)

From: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2013 13:06:06 +0200
To: John Lumley <john@saxonica.com>
CC: Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org>, EXPath <public-expath@w3.org>, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>, Florent Georges <fgeorges@fgeorges.org>
Message-ID: <5200D89E.9000603@kosek.cz>

On 6.8.2013 12:38, John Lumley wrote:
> On 05/08/2013 10:02, Adam Retter wrote:
>>> What about bin:subpart() ?
>> I think just bin:part() would be enough
> Sounds pretty good to me - simple, doesn't conflict with anything else
> as far as I can see. Can anyone see some other meaning or possible
> conflict that we've overlooked?

bin:part() seems OK, we can also consider bin:block()

    Jirka

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
       Professional XML consulting and training services
  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
------------------------------------------------------------------
 OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
------------------------------------------------------------------
    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2013 11:06:38 UTC