Re: EXPath binary module - comments - bin:subsequence()

On 05/08/2013 10:02, Adam Retter wrote:
>> What about bin:subpart() ?
> I think just bin:part() would be enough
Sounds pretty good to me - simple, doesn't conflict with anything else 
as far as I can see. Can anyone see some other meaning or possible 
conflict that we've overlooked?

-- 
*John Lumley* MA PhD CEng FIEE
john@saxonica.com <mailto:john@saxonica.com>
on behalf of Saxonica Ltd