- From: Taki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:56:25 -0700
- To: "'Gengo Suzuki'" <suzuki.gengo@lab.ntt.co.jp>, <public-exi@w3.org>
Hi Suzuki-san, Thank you for providing a feedback that allows the WG to improve the language of the spec in a way to make it clearer to all the readers. As you alluded in your comment, the types that are elligible are only simple types. Therefore, the implementors of user-defined datatype representations not only do not need to be concerned about event-codes chore, but also indeed have no access to them. We acknowledge that some of the sentences in that section can be improved for clarity, as well as Example 7-3 in which the type name "geo:geometricSurface" might have indicated that it represented a complex type thus was misleading. We will make changes to make it unequivocal both in the language and the example. Thanks! -taki -----Original Message----- From: public-exi-request@w3.org [mailto:public-exi-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gengo Suzuki Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 5:42 PM To: public-exi@w3.org Subject: Complex Datatype representation map Hello, I have a question about Datatype Representation Map In 7.4 of Working Draft, Example 7-2 shows single type representation map. Below the example an outline to implement it are described, and I can image to use it. Example 7-3 shows (perhaps) representation map for complex type. There is no detailed explanation about it. I feel that it is not trivial to implement complex type map, because in a complex type case event code determination rules are unclear to treat child types. Mapping influence grammar production. Is it responsibility for implementor of EXI processor? Or can datatype representation map be used only in single type case? Sincerely, //--------------------------------------------------------------- NTT Cyber Space Laboratories Gengo Suzuki <suzuki.gengo@lab.ntt.co.jp> TEL: +81-46-859-3412 FAX: +81-46-859-2768 ----------------------------------------------------------------//
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 17:57:36 UTC