- From: Jaakko Kangasharju <jkangash@cc.hut.fi>
- Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:56:29 +0200
- To: innovimax@gmail.com
- Cc: public-exi-comments@w3.org
Hello Mohamed and thank you for your comment. On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Mohamed ZERGAOUI wrote: > In 7.3.3 Partitions Optimized for Frequent use of String Literals > > It is said : > [[ > Editorial note > String values representing value content items are never added to the > string table once valueAmount reaches valuePartitionCapacity. The > working group is still looking at other alternatives to cap the amount > of memory used for value partitions that can result in more compact > representation of string values overall, including those that involve > reassignment of compact identifiers using some sort of round-robin > selection method, and the expected effect on processing efficiency of > each alternative. > ]] > > Please consider using Move to front method When initially discussing the valuePartitionCapacity option, the working group analyzed several different potential methods for treating new strings when the maximum capacity is reached. These methods included Move to front, which you proposed. The group does not believe that Move to front can be sufficiently efficient to serve as the replacement method, based on analysis of the possible algorithms in this context. The string table is used constantly when processing an EXI document, so it needs to be as efficient as possible, and we do not believe that the potential improvement in compactness is worth the amount of decreased processing efficiency that Move to front is estimated to result in. -- Jaakko Kangasharju, Helsinki University of Technology If you want a response, you must demonstrate familiarity with ordinal arithmetic
Received on Monday, 16 February 2009 13:57:28 UTC