- From: Taki Kamiya <tkamiya@us.fujitsu.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:53:28 -0700
- To: "'Simon Parker'" <simon.parker@polarlake.com>, <public-exi-comments@w3.org>
Hi Simon, The EXI WG is grateful for your interest in the EXI documents, your attention to the language details in particluar, and the time and care to report them back to us. It will surely make a difference, and such a report is valuable to the continuous effort of improving the quality of EXI deliverables. We have worked on the suggested changes in our internal editor's draft copy of the documents. You will see the changes in the public draft when the documents are published next time around. There is one suggestion in your report that might have been a result of confusion. The wording of "Schema-deviated" in section "8.5 Schema-informed grammars" was indeed meant to be phrased that way. To make the intent clearer, we plan to modify the sentence as follows. "Of particular note is that built-in grammars that are invoked for schema-invalid occurrences of elements or the elements that matched either SE(*) or SE(uri:*) but are not declared in the schema are still subject to dynamic grammar learning during the rest of the EXI stream processing as is described in 8.4.2 Built-in Fragment Grammar. " Thanks again, -taki ________________________________ From: public-exi-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-exi-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Simon Parker Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 2:56 AM To: public-exi-comments@w3.org Subject: Minor text corrections Good morning. The EXI specification is a fine document, and together with its primer is a clear and rigorous presentation of the standard. While reading, I noted a few minor spelling mistakes and similar issues. In case they haven't already been noticed and fixed in a new draft, I've listed them here. Nothing here is intended to change the meaning of the specification. Feel free to incorporate the suggestions, or ignore them, or make different changes. --- PRIMER _'by example', second note Attribute date="2007-09-12" Content column says correctly "0 1B 0 1" Note column says "0 uint 1 1 (value hit)" but it should say "0 uint 0 1 (value hit)" --- SPECIFICATION _5.4 EXI Options Last paragraph, definition of valuePartitionCapacity option Replace "enitiries" with "entries" _Last paragraph before 6.1 Replace "effect " by "affect" _Introductory paragraph of 8.5 Schema-informed grammars Replace "schema-deviated" with "schema-derived" _8.5.4.1.6 Element Terms Replace "itself if was" with "itself if it was" _10 Conformance Review use of English throughout this section, particularly: plural and singular forms, and the phrase "that EXI stream decoders are prepared with" _B.1 Document Information Item [unparsed entities] Delete the last occurrence of "to". _B.11 Namespace Information Item Replace "ismaps toa NS event" with "maps to a NS event" _E Deriving Character Sets from XML Schema Regular Expressions In sentence 2 replace "lexically matches" with "lexically match" _E Deriving Character Sets from XML Schema Regular Expressions In the notes on rules [3] and [4] replace "causes to conclude the charset of the regExp" with "causes the charset of the regExp" --- Hope this helps, Simon Simon Parker Software Consultant PolarLake 80 Harcourt Street Dublin 2, Ireland Phone +353 1 449-1075 Fax +353 1 449-1011 Web http://www.polarlake.com/
Received on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 17:54:36 UTC