- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:36:29 -0000
- To: <public-evangelist@w3.org>
"Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org> Le 21 nov. 2004, à 08:27, Jim Ley a écrit : >>> some others only the text without images and CSS, which is fine by me. >> So I can't support your decision on pragmatic grounds, so I really think >> you're expecting too much from these services. For deploying new >> mime-types you can use content-negotiation, do that, and you get what you >> want, it may be more complicated for you, but that's reasonable, it's you >> not your users that have chosen to be modern. > >ANd I don't ask you to support it ;) personal choice. :) It was not the >purpose of the mail. I was just trying to evangelise a more pragmatic choice... >Anyway I repeat the real question of this mail. Do you know other services >which can't handle application/xhtml+xml. I've certainly seen them (I suspect they don't actually care about the mime-type rather than actively supporting application/xhtml+xml ) I'll see if I can remember/turn them up. Jim.
Received on Sunday, 21 November 2004 14:36:40 UTC