- From: Tex Texin <tex@XenCraft.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 14:59:59 -0500
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-evangelist@w3.org, 'Soren Johannessen' <hal@ae35-unit.dk>
Karl, It could be the philosophy behind the validator has changed, but in Nov. 2002, I reported that the validator did not check for problems such as links to fragments that do not exist. (e.g. <a href="#tex"> with no corresponding id=tex or name=tex in the document). At the time it was stated that it wasn't a priority for the validator to find problems such as this, unless it was covered by the DTD. i.e. strictly speaking it wasn't a validation problem. (Nov 2002 on the www-validator list.) So my understanding is that just because a page validates, it doesn't mean that it is likely error-free. tex Karl Dubost wrote: > > Le 08 mars 2004, à 10:54, Tex Texin a écrit : > > pages, just validation or disagreement between the page and the DTD. > > So it is > > possible for pages to be non-standard or have errors and still > > validate. > > Do you mean with regards to other specifications than HTML like for > example accessibility? > or with regards to the semantics defined in each HTML specifications > (taking into account, there's no conformance section defining that an > HTML document MUST respect the Semantics of HTML.) > > Do you have something else in mind? > > > Perhaps there is a need for a "checker" which attempts to identify all > > possible > > violations of relevant w3c standards. > > What kind of checker would you imagine? How will it operate? > Automatically, manually? > > > Note my point is not (here anyway) to lobby for a change to the > > standards, but > > to incorproate into these surveys the opportunities to get insight and > > explanations for the behaviors found. The info can help the design of > > future > > standards or the development of tools to improve migration and > > upgrading. > > You could contribute to the Mailing list www-html@w3.org or you could > explore possibilities of good markup for HTML. > > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTMLBestPractices > > Someone has already started that and with the contribution of many > people, he has explored HTML Markup. I'm pretty sure, it could be > pushed a bit further. > > http://www.simplebits.com/bits/simplequiz/ > > He will publish a book (PS: I don't know if all people who have > participated in the comments will have money in return or at least a > free copy of the book ;)). > > -- > Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ > W3C Conformance Manager > *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Name: PGP.sig > PGP.sig Type: application/pgp-signature > Encoding: 7bit > Description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?= -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex at XenCraft.com Xen Master XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com Making e-Business Work Around the World -------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 8 March 2004 15:00:12 UTC