- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 09:38:50 -0400
- To: public-evangelist@w3.org
- Message-Id: <4E6C1FAD-D664-11D8-BAB6-000A95718F82@w3.org>
Hi Tex, Le 15 juil. 2004, à 08:12, Tex Texin a écrit : > Just to be clear, is it your intent to consider weblogs as > replacements for > discussion lists, or publishing in other forms, or do you simply mean > as yet another form of publishing? I presume the latter. * Mailing lists Not a replacement for mailing list. Mailing-lists are still the main communication tool for many of our activities: - Technical discussions - Issues tracking - Comments on Specifications It's very important to keep it as it is to not miss any issues, or concerns that people have about a technology. If there are too many sources of information for issues tracking, we will miss them and that's not good at all. * Weblogs As another form of publishing, helping people inside the Team to get feedback on a few things, to share our own hacks or progress on things, etc. As It has been said, I think the "weblog form" is more accessible than a mailing-list for many persons. It would help a better interaction. I know that many persons in the W3C Team have very valuable technological knowledge and a simple way to share it and better (in terms of presentation) than the www-archive [1] mailing list would be great. But to convince people inside the W3C Team that the effort is worthwhile, we need your testimonials AND the reasons why you think it's a good idea or a bad idea. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/ -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 15 July 2004 09:38:50 UTC