- From: SanJo;\) <tumkho@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:40:55 -0400
- To: "Tom Gilder" <tom@tom.me.uk>, <public-evangelist@w3.org>
It shouldn't always be the job of the browser to validate. What do you suggest MS do? Make IE chuck an error if it finds an invalid tag? Make thousands of websites instantly stop working and annoy users? No. I expect Web developers to do shoddy work and get away with it. That way, if I enter my credit card number on a less-than-secure page on, say Amazon.com, the entire world will have it. > The last browser to require Web developers to code page correctly > was Netscape Communicator 4.79. I still use this browser and, > because of it I am able to launch top quality Websites. Well then, define correct HTML for me. Pending your response, I view my pages in Netscape (and IE) to see how the browser will render them. Netscape is honest enough to "tell" me when a table or paragraph tag is missing. It doesn't try to do my thinking for me. Browser standards should require correct coding not gloss over sub-quality work. Er... lucky you. Or something. Maybe it isn't in fact they're being marked-up worse, more than they're moving to standards, and don't work in your broken and outdated browser? I have a Pentium-1 computer that works just fine, except for the computer industry's planned obsolesence, which renders a perfectly good computer useless. Outdated is a relative, and in the computer industry, predetermined term. Likewise, Netscape 4.79 works quite well. However, because Microsoft has the computer industry by the prverbial floppy disks, the "standardars" are leaning in its direction. Consequently, everthing that is contrary to the proclaimations of Bill Gates (who legally should be in jail) is considered broken and outdated.
Received on Sunday, 29 September 2002 15:34:30 UTC